![]() ![]() ![]() One thing that everyone does agree about is testing and experimenting with different setups until you find the sweet spot with your existing rig. A number of free and priced solutions exist for both down-sampling and up-sampling (as long as all of your equipment including soundcard can sample 96kHz). If you do have the facility to experiment with both sample rates by all means do so. The human ear can only perceive sounds within the 20Hz to 20kHz range. Anyway, two questions, if you’d be so kind I’ve found a couple of threads that suggest that the TASCAM. Basically because I hardly use it except for playback, working almost exclusively in raw MIDI. There seems to be a general disagreement between the professional audio community about the superiority of 96kHz sampling over 48kHz.Īudio CDs are recorded at 44.1kHz (16-bit). Hi I’ve recently upgraded my whole system but now find that I can’t install the drivers for the only part that I haven’t upgraded namely, the Audio Interface (TASCAM US-122 Mk II). With USB 2.0 carrying 40 times the speed of USB 1 / 1.1 the TASCAM US-122L upgrades its recording capabilities from 48kHz as found in the TASCAM US-122 to 96kHz. The TASCAM US-122L builds on the successful formula offered by the US-122 by upgrading USB to version 2 and increasing recording to 96kHz from 48kHz. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |